Geographical systematization of UNESCO World Heritage Sites


Keywords: UNESCO World Heritage, cultural sites, natural sites, mixed sites, «endangered» sites, intangible cultural heritage sites

Abstract

The article presents the results of inventory checking of objects of natural and cultural heritage of mankind. Preservation of cultural heritage has been noted as an important task during any period in history. The article specifies what objects can be considered cultural or natural heritage of mankind. We describe what advantages the status of world heritage site give to the site itself and to the country as a whole. The existence of the UNESCO World Heritage List allows one to identify a number of unresolved issues regarding the protection and preservation of cultural heritage in the countries. Despite the fact that the UNESCO World Heritage List is the object of scientific attention of many authors, the data presented in their publications are outdated and therefore unable to provide current coverage of the geographical structure of the World Heritage, as it is quite dynamic and changing every year. We analyzed researches on the chosen subject by domestic and foreign authors, finding that the main array of scientific publications for the query “UNESCO World Heritage” offers studies of the effects of UNESCO sites on tourist flows or the tourist brand of the region or country. At the same time, there is a range of scientific publications criticizing the very existence of the UNESCO World Heritage List, as well as the current criteria for nomination and inclusion of sites in the UNESCO World Heritage, uneven distribution of sites between developing and developed countries – geopolitical axis “North – South” and the lack of effective protection and conservation mechanisms in the UNESCO and even in the UN, even for places already included in the List of Sites. At the same time, there is a lack of geographical research on the distribution of the UNESCO World Heritage sites and complete absence of research on the territorial organization of intangible cultural heritage sites. A historiographical analysis of UNESCO World Heritage sites has been carried out, and the dynamics of changes in the number of sites has been analyzed. The article presents structural-territorial analysis of the distribution of objects : we determined absolute and relative indicators of the number of objects by macroregions and types, analyzed the typological ratio of objects within the regions, and identified the leading and outsider countries of each region. A cartographic model of the distribution of objects by the planet is presented. The expediency of regular monitoring of the current state of recreational and tourist resources of world importance and analysis of the tendency of deterioration or improvement of the related situation regarding non-compliance with the norms of protection and preservation of cultural and natural monuments is substantiated. We also analyzed the territorial distribution of the “Under threat” list, which includes 53 objects from 33 countries. The article contains our ideas about the prescriptive rather than the recommendatory nature of the remarks of the UNESCO World Heritage Committee, which could radically effect the elimination of all processes that threaten UNESCO sites. Territorial analysis of the distribution of intangible cultural heritage of mankind has been carried out.

Author Biography

Mariya V. Lushchyk
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine

References

1. Arsenenko, I. A., Donchenko, L. M., Levada, O. M., & Donets’, I. A., 2018. Heoprostorove rozmishchennya ob»yektiv vsesvitn’oyi spadshchyny YuNESKO ta yikh znachennya dlya rozvytku turyzmu u sviti. [Geospatial location of UNESCO World Heritage Sites and their importance for the development of tourism in the world.]. Naukovyy visnyk Khersons’koho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriya «Heohrafichni nauky» – Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Geographical Sciences Series, (9), 210–218. (In Ukrainian).
2. Bezuhlyi, V.V., Kostashchuk, I.I., Yavorska, V.V., 2021. Heohrafiia vsesvitnoi spadshchyny (turystychni atraktsii). [World Heritage Geography (tourist attractions)]. Dnipro: LIRA. (In Ukrainian).
3. Browse the Lists of Intangible Cultural Heritage and the Register of good safeguarding practices. ich.unesco.org. Retrieved from: https://ich.unesco.org/en/lists
4. Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. whc.unesco.org. Retrieved from: http://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/
5. Frey, B. S., Steiner, L.,2011. World Heritage List: does it make sense? International Journal of Cultural Policy. 17, Issue 5. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2010.541906
6. Hosseinia, K., Stefanieca, A., Hosseinib, S. P.,2021. World Heritage Sites in developing countries: Assessing impacts and handling complexities toward sustainable tourism. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management. 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2021.100616
7. Konvenciya pro oxoronu nematerial’noyi kul’turnoyi spadshhy’ny’. [Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage]. (n. d.). zakon4.rada.gov. ua. Retrieved from: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/995_d69/page (In Ukrainian).
8. Konvenciya pro oxoronu vsesvitn’oyi kul’turnoyi i pry’rodnoyi spadshhy’ny’ [Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage]. (n. d.). zakon2.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://zakon2. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_089. [In Ukrainian].
9. Konvenciya pro zaxy’st kul’turny’x cinnostej u vy’padku zbrojnogo konfliktu, 2002. [Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict]. Kul’turna spadshhy’na Ukrayiny’. Pravovi zasady’ zberezhennya, vidtvorennya ta oxorony’ kul’turno- istory’chnogo seredovy’shha – Cultural heritage of Ukraine. Legal bases of preservation, reproduction and protection of cultural and historical environment. Kyiv: [b. v.]. (In Ukrainian).
10. List of World Heritage in Danger. whc.unesco.org. Retrieved from: http://whc.unesco.org/en/danger/.
11. Rao, K., 2010. A new paradigm for the identification, nomination and inscription of properties on the World Heritage List. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 16, Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527251003620594
12. Smal’, I.V., 2010. Turystychni resursy svitu [Tourist resources of the world]. Nizhyn: Vyd-vo Nizhyn. derzh. un-u im. M. Hoholya. (In Ukrainian).
13. Stafiychuk, V. I., Malynovs’ka, O. Yu., 2009. Turystychne krayinoznavstvo: turystychni resursy svitu. Yevropa, Aziya, Avstraliya ta Okeaniya. [Tourist country studies: tourist resources of the world. Europe, Asia, Australia and Oceania]. Kyiv: Al’terpres. (In Ukrainian).
14. The Criteria for selection. whc.unesco.org. Retrieved from: http://whc.unesco.org/en/criteria/
15. UNESCO World Heritage List. whc.unesco.org. Retrieved from: http://whc.unesco.org/en/list
16. World Heritage List by Region. whc.unesco.org. Retrieved from: http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/CID=31 &SEARCH=&SEARCH_BY_COUNTRY=®IO N=5&ORDER=&TYPE=&&order=year
17. Zakon Ukrayiny Pro pry’yednannya Ukrayiny’ do Konvenciyi pro oxoronu nematerial’noyi kul’turnoyi spadshhy’ny’ vid 06.03.2008 No 132 –VI [Law of Ukraine On Accession of Ukraine to the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of March 6, 2008 No 132 –VI] (2008, March 6). Vidom. Verxovnoyi Rady’ Ukrayiny’ – Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 16, p.153. (In Ukrainian).
18. Zarakhovs’kyy, O. Ye. (2012). Systema ob»yektiv Svitovoyi spadshchyny YuNESKO: heohrafichnyy aspekt. [UNESCO World Heritage Site: Geographical Aspect]. Heohrafiya ta turyzm – Geography and tourism, (17), 196–202.
Published
2022-08-04
How to Cite
Lushchyk, M. (2022). Geographical systematization of UNESCO World Heritage Sites. Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology, 31(2), 352-362. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15421/112233