Regulatory mechanisms of responsible aquaculture and sustainable development of ecotourism in territorial communities


Keywords: ecotourism, territorial community development, recreational services, synergetic effect in tourism, responsible aquaculture

Abstract

The article analyzes the current state of aquaculture production and recreation in Ukraine, industry problems, the potential and possible ways of situation improvement. It examines tools for developing aquaculture production based on the integration with ecotourism. One has developed a scheme of the interaction between industries and other economic entities in Ukraine. The goal of the article is a comprehensive analysis of the development of responsible aquaculture combined with the ecotourism growth, encouraging the improvement of Ukraine’s economic, tourist and natural potential, sustainable development and economic growth along with the application of resource-saving technologies. One has concluded that the existing synergetic effect has a positive nature and allows not only creating competitive products for Ukrainian consumers but also entering the global market, involving users of recreational services in Ukraine, which substantially increases the potential of this region. The article analyzes the current state of ecotourism in Ukraine, provides recommendations for solving existing problems and increasing the investment flow in the industry by enhancing the demand for ecotourism products, which will positively affect macroeconomic indicators and the national reputation. It is proven that the responsibility for the regional ecological state and control over local enterprise activities should be delegated to local communities because of their susceptibility to changes and rapid response in order to create social systems of environment quality control. One has developed models of dependence of ecotourism development on investments in recreation facilities where the quantity and quality of services will significantly grow, which can become competitive on both internal and external markets and have unique offers not only by applying natural resources but also by providing technological and complex services. It is proven that the use of innovative technologies based on the automation of the aquaculture production process will enhance financial results and decrease external negative effects. Besides, it is more eco-friendly than conventional pond production, but it is capital-intensive and requires investment generation.

Author Biographies

Viktor V. Koval
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Inesa S. Mikhno
National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine
Oleksandr V. Deineha
Rivne State University of Humanities, Rivne, Ukraine
Ihor V. Bezuhlyi
Chernihiv Polytechnic National University, Chernihiv, Ukraine
Inna O. Deineha
Rivne State University of Humanities, Rivne, Ukraine
Viktoriia V. Udovychenko
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine

References

1. Arktikfish, 2021. Svіtovі tendencії rozvitku akvakulturi [World trends in aquaculture]. Retrieved from: http://arktikfish.com/index.php/stati-po-akvakulture/26- mirovye-tendentsii-akvakultury (In Ukrainian)
2. Burgaz, M., Matvienko, T., Bezik, K., & Soborova, O., 2019. The current state of fish market in Ukraine. Ukrainian Journal of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, 2(3), 6–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32718/ ujvas2–3.02
3. Burkynskyi, B., Martienko, A., Khumarova, N., Prokopiuk, A., 2018. Property Management Dominants for Recreational Natural Resources. Economics. Ecology. Socium, 2, 77–90.
4. Chai-Arayalert, Supaporn, 2020. Smart application of learning ecotourism for young eco-tourists. Cogent Social Sciences 6(1), 1772558.
5. De Schryver, P., Crab, R., Defoirdt, T., Boon, N., Verstraete, W., 2008. The basics of bio-flocs technology: the added value for aquaculture. Aquaculture, 277(3–4), 125–137.
6. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny [State Statistics Service of Ukraine]. 2021. Retrieved from: ukrstat.gov. ua (In Ukrainian).
7. Dickson Adom, 2019. The place and voice of local people, culture, and traditions: A catalyst for ecotourism development in rural communities in Ghana. Scientific African 6. e00184.
8. Dyudyaeva, O.A., 2021. The state of the harmonization of Ukrainian legislation with European norms in the field of the production of organic aquaculture. Water bioresоurces and aquaculture, 1(9), 62–85.
9. Faostat, 2021. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny [State Statistics Service of Ukraine]. Retrieved from: http://www.fao.orq/corp/ statistics (In Ukrainian).
10. Forrester, J. W., 1995. The beginning of system dynamics. The Mckinsey Quarterly, 4, 4–16.
11. Grant, J., & Pastres, R., 2019. Ecosystem models of bivalve aquaculture: implications for supporting goods and services. Goods and Services of Marine Bivalves. 507–525. Springer, Cham.
12. Gui, J. F., Tang, Q., Li, Z., Liu, J., De Silva, S. S., 2018. Aquaculture in China: success stories and modern trends. John Wiley & Sons. Willey Blackwell. 720 p.
13. Harbar, Z., Selezneva, O., Litvinov, O., Kaptalan, S., Gonchar, V., 2020. Strategic Marketing Management Of Innovative Activities In Ensuring Enterprise Economic Security. REICE: Revista Electrónica de Investigación en Ciencias Económicas, 8 (15), 298–313. https://doi. org/10.5377/reice.v8i15.9961
14. Kostetska, K., 2018. Trends of Development of Administrative Management of Recreational and Tourist Nature Production in Domestic and International Practice. Economics. Ecology. Socium, 2, 111–121.
15. Laktionova, O., Harbar, Z., Melikhov, A., Slobodianiuk, O., Gevko, V., Desiatskyi, S., 2022. Financing the greening of enterprises in industrial regions of Ukraine in the context of sustainable development. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 43(4), 574–584). https://doi.org/10.15544/ mts.2021.52
16. María Camila, Sánchez-Prieto et al., 2021. Planning Ecotourism in Coastal Protected Areas; Projecting Temporal Management Scenarios. Sustainability, 13(14), 7528.
17. Matheus NP Henares, Mateus V. Medeiros, and Antonio FM Camargo, 2020. Overview of strategies that contribute to the environmental sustainability of pond aquaculture: rearing systems, residue treatment, and environmental assessment tools. Reviews in Aquaculture, 12, 453–470.
18. Mazur, A., Kubai, O., 2019. Scientific-methodological and practical principles of regional economic systems integration. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256–0742/2019–5– 2–117–123
19. Mikhno, I., Koval, V., Shvets, G., Garmatiuk, O., Tamošiūnienė, R., 2021. Green economy in sustainable development and improvement of resource efficiency. Central European Business Review (CEBR), 10(1), 99–113.
20. Outeiro, L., Byron, C., Angelini, R., 2018. Ecosystem maturity as a proxy of mussel aquaculture carrying capacity in Ria de Arousa (NW Spain): A food web modeling perspective. Aquaculture, 496, 270–284.
21. Upravlinnya Derzhavnogo agentstva melioraciyi ta ry’bnogo gospodarstva u m. Kyevi ta Kyivskij oblasti [Department of the State Agency for Land Reclamation and Fisheries in Kyiv and Kyiv region]., 2021. Retrieved from: https://kv.darg.gov.ua/ (In Ukrainian).
22. Upravlinnya Derzhavnogo agentstva melioraciyi ta ry’bnogo gospodarstva u m. Kyevi ta Kyivskij oblasti [Department of the State Agency for Land Reclamation and Fisheries in Kyiv and Kyiv region], 2022. Interactive map of aquaculture enterprises of Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://kv.darg.gov.ua/_interaktivna_ karta_0_0_0_2020_1.html (In Ukrainian).
23. Varga, M., Berzi-Nagy, L., Csukas, B., Gyalog, G., 2020. Long-term dynamic simulation of environmental impactes on ecosystem-based pond aquaculture. Environmental Modelling & Software, 134, 104755.
24. Vergara-Solana, Francisco, Marcelo E. Araneda, German Ponce-Díaz. 2019. Opportunities for strengthening aquaculture industry through multicriteria decision- making. Reviews in aquaculture, 11, 105–118.
25. Weitzman, J., Filgueira, R., 2020. The evolution and application of carrying capacity in aquaculture: towards a research agenda. Reviews in Aquaculture, 12(3), 1297–1322.
26. Yankovyi, V., Koval, V., Dudka, T., Bykhovchenko, V., 2021. Statistical assessment of project economic priority in company’s investment management. Revista Gestion de las Personas y Tecnologia, 42, 98–119. https://doi. org/10.35588/gpt.v15i42.5284
Published
2022-08-04
How to Cite
Koval, V., Mikhno, I., Deineha, O., Bezuhlyi, I., Deineha, I., & Udovychenko, V. (2022). Regulatory mechanisms of responsible aquaculture and sustainable development of ecotourism in territorial communities. Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology, 31(2), 333-342. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15421/112231

Most read articles by the same author(s)