Inclusive development of social entrepreneurship in nature management


Keywords: inclusive development, social entrepreneurship, nature management, index approach

Abstract

Social entrepreneurship development in Ukraine is a priority guideline based on the creation and improvement of government policy on ecosystem orientation and inclusion, which provides public access to tourism and natural resources. The main component of inclusive development of social entrepreneurship emphasizes the basic principles of its existence, such as the ability to achieve one’s own goals, despite the economic effect of one’s activities. In the quantitative comparative analysis and need to reach economic indicators, the main factors are determined by the idea of inclusive development in nature management, as a field of activity in which not only the state but also multidisciplinary international organizations invest. The aim of the article is to identify opportunities for inclusive nature management development in social entrepreneurship in Ukraine by summarizing the existing practice of using indices and identifying indicators that will correspond to inclusive nature management parameters. Determining the position and directions of social entrepreneurship development in Ukraine was determined using an index approach, which, in contrast to others, allows one to identify indicators that characterize the sphere of development on economic and environmental influence of the country on the basis of inclusivity. The analysis of international rating assessments and Ukraine’s place in them requires a rethinking of existing approaches to the search for economically feasible ways to improve socio-economic and environmental indicators and their rating positions. The method of multi-indicator immersion is used in the article to identify the main indicators of economic, inclusive growth and social components, which are due to the experience in nature management and characterize the development of social entrepreneurship. The calculations of the Inclusive Development Index of Social Entrepreneurship in Ukraine as a consolidated index according to the geometric formula, which comprised synthetic indicators of the human capital index to outline the inclusive range of components, brand index and index of environmental indicators, proved that today the ecological state of environment and health of the population have a significant negative impact on economic growth and welfare of the population.

Author Biographies

Kateryna O. Kostetska
Institute of Market Problems and Economic-Ecological Research NAS of Ukraine, Odessa
Yevgeniia G. Gordiichuk
Institute of Market Problems and Economic-Ecological Research NAS of Ukraine, Odessa
Аnastasiia V. Movchaniuk
Uman National University of Horticulture, Uman
Nataliia M. Vdovenko
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
Vitalii V. Nahornyi
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
Viktor V. Koval
National Academy of Sciences, Kyiv

References

1. Bagmet, K., 2018. Regulation of institutional changes in the social sector of the national economy: conceptual approach. Economics. Ecology. Socium, 2(4), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.31520/2616–7107/2018.2.4–10
2. Balestra, C., & Dottori, D., 2011. Aging society, health and the environment. Journal of Population Economics, 25(3), 1045–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148– 011–0380-x
3. Baranets, I., 2020. Inclusive labor market for creation of job places in Ukraine as the main definition of sustainable development. Economics. Ecology. Socium, 4(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.31520/2616–7107/2020.4.2–1
4. Dixon, T., 2011. Putting the S-word back into Sustainability: Can we be more social? OISD/The Berkeley Group, Oxford Brookes University.
5. Golovne upravlinnja statystyky v Kyiv'kij oblasti., 2020. The main indicators of socio-economic development of Kyiv region. Retrieved from: http://kyivobl.ukrstat. gov.ua/content/
6. Golovne upravlinnja statystyky v Odes'kij oblasti., 2020. The main indicators of socio-economic development of Odessa region. Retrieved from: http://www.ukrstat. gov.ua/
7. Golovne upravlinnja statystyky v Ukraine., 2020. The main indicators of socio-economic development of Ukraine. Retrieved from: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/
8. Golovne upravlinnja statystyky v Zakarpatskiy oblasti., 2020. The main indicators of socio-economic development of Zakarpatskiy region. Retrieved from: http://www. uz.ukrstat.gov.ua/
9. Gubanova, E., Kupinets, L., Deforzh, H., Koval, V., & Gaska, K., 2019. Recycling of polymer waste in the context of developing circular economy. Architecture Civil Engineering Environment, 12(4), 99–108.
10. Jasimin, T.H., & Ali, H.M., 2014. The Impact of Sustainability on the Value of Commercial Office Buildings in Malaysia: Russian-Doll Model Approach.
11. Kostetska, K., Khumarova, N., Umanska, Y., Shmygol, N., & Koval, V., 2020. Institutional Qualities of Inclusive Environmental Management in Sustainable Economic Development. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 28(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.2478/ mspe-2020–0003
12. Kostetska, K., Laurinaitis, M., Savenko, I., Sedikova, I., & Sylenko, S. (2020). Mining management based on inclusive economic approach. E 3S Web of Conferences, 201, 01009. https://doi.org/10.1051/ e3sconf/202020101009
13. Koval, V., & Mikhno, I., 2019. Ecological sustainability preservation of national economy by waste management methods. Economics. Ecology. Socium, 3(2), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.31520/2616–7107/2019.3.2–4
14. Levett, R., 2002. Royal Statistical Society Publications. Royal Statistical Society. Retrieved from: https://doi. org/10.1111/1467–985X.00109
15. Lyytimäki, J., Gudmundsson, H., & Sørensen, C. H., 2011. Russian Dolls and Chinese Whispers: Two Perspectives on the Unintended Effects of Sustainability Indicator Communication. Sustainable Development, 22(2), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.530
16. Margerum, R. D., 2006. John Brady (Ed.), Environmental Management in Organizations: The IEMA Handbook, Earthscan, Stylus Publishing.
17. Mikhno, I., Koval, V., Shvets, G., Garmatiuk, O., & Tamošiūnienė, R., 2021. Green economy in sustainable development and improvement of resource efficiency. Central European Business Review (CEBR), 10(1), 99–113.
18. Open Knowledge Repository., 2019. Human Capital Development Project. Retrieved from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/ handle/10986/30498/33324RU.pdf?sequence=13& isAllowed=y
19. Open Knowledge Repository., 2020. Doing Business 2020: Comparing Business Regulation in 190 Economies. Retrieved from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/ handle/10986/32436
20. Popova, O., Koval, V., Antonova, L., & Оrel, A., 2019. Corporate social responsibility of agricultural enterprises according to their economic status. Management theory and studies for rural business and infrastructure development, 41(2), 277–289.
21. SEDAK., 2020. Environmental Performance Index, 2020 Release (1950–2020). Retrieved from: https://doi. org/10.7927/f54c-0r44
22. Seleznоva, O., Boiko, O., & Bondar, V., 2020. Theoretical means for social entrepreneurship research in context of marketing 3.0. Economics. Ecology. Socium, 4(2), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.31520/2616–7107/2020.4.2–3
23. SHLC., 2020. Sustainable Neighbourhood Development in Emerging Economies: A Review. Documentation. GCRF. Retrieved from: http://www.centreforsustainablecities. ac.uk/research/research-reports/sustainable- neighbourhood-development-in-emerging-economies- review.
24. Social Progress Imperative., 2020. Global Index: Overview.. Retrieved from: https://www.socialprogress.org/index/ global
25. Su, M.-T., 2014. Examination of the diverse views of sustainable development: an approach to monetize the environment, economy, and society. Business Perspectives – Home Page. Retrieved from: https://www.businessperspectives.org/index.php/ journals/environmental-economics/issue-222/ examination-of-the-diverse-views-of-sustainable-development-an-approach-to-monetize-the-environment- economy-and-society
26. Vdovenko, N. M., & Nakonechna, K. V., 2017. Mechanisms and tools of supply regulation in agricultural sector of economy. Scientific Bulletin of Polissia, 3 (1), 165–169.
27. WIPO – World Intellectual Property Organization., 2020. Global Innovation Index 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.wipo.int/publications/ru/details.jsp?id=4514
28. World Economic Forum., 2019. The Inclusive Development Index 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.weforum.org/ reports/the-inclusive-development-index-2018
29. World Health Organization., 2012. Measurement of and targetsetting for well-being: an initiative by the WHO Regional Office for Europe (First meeting of the expert group).
Published
2021-10-05
How to Cite
Kostetska, K., Gordiichuk, Y., MovchaniukА., Vdovenko, N., Nahornyi, V., & Koval, V. (2021). Inclusive development of social entrepreneurship in nature management. Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology, 30(3), 500-511. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15421/112146

Most read articles by the same author(s)