Chornobyl Phenomenon: Catastrophe, Experimental Area vs Curiousity Object


Keywords: Chornobyl phenomenon, tourist attraction, destination, Chornobyl “image”, exclusion zone

Abstract

The article is devoted to a qualitative thematic study of the Chernobyl phenomenon as a holistic phenomenon that combines a number of manifestations: from objects of direct visual perception to legends and myths about events, processes and Chernobyl in general. The integrity of the image of the Chornobyl zone makes the Exclusion Zone an attractive tourist destination, especially for those who is interested in gaining such experience. At the same time, using the method of thematic research and based on statistics, the Chernobyl phenomenon is considered in its real context and as a kind of indirect means to determinethe level of interest of citizens of different countries in Ukraine (as a carrier of unique culture, history and world events). The results of the article are a contextual analysis of the phenomenon of Chernobyl as a tourist destination. Resource opportunities of nuclear tourism in the Chornobyl zone are analyzed. Methodological qualitative case study of the Chernobyl phenomenon includes accounting and description of tourist resources of Nature and resources of cultural identity of the cities of Pripyat, Chernobyl (with adjoining territories), which are cultural artifacts and are elements of the nuclear heritage of Ukraine, and can be included and presented in tourist routes. The contextual analysis of this study concerned the consideration and processing of data on the Chornobyl zone as a holistic phenomenon, from cartographic, textual documents, comparative analysis data of visitor loyalty, partial mathematical and statistical analysis of tourist attendance data. This case study is an approach to a comprehensive study of the phenomenon in the context of its actual existence using a variety of data sources. It is this comprehensiveness in the study of the phenomenon that ensures that the object is viewed from different angles, which allows you to reveal and understand all aspects of the phenomenon. The article reveals the main components of the Chernobyl phenomenon, mentions key tourist attractions that have their own history and shrouded in prophecies, legends and myths, as well as analyzes the tourist attendance of this destination by different categories of tourists, indicating significant interest in this territory.

Author Biographies

Volodymyr F. Kaluha
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
Serhii I. Uliganets
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv
Olexander Y. Dmytruk
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv
Liudmyla V. Melnyk
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv
Tetiana G. Kupach
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv

References

1. Atomic Culture. Atomic Heritage Foundation. – Retrieved from http://www.atomicheritage.org/history/atomic-culture
2. Baxter, P., Jack, S. 2008. Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559. – Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/ tqr/vol13/iss4/2
3. Beer, M., Rybár, R., Kalavský, M. 2017. Renewable energy sources as an attractive element of industrial tourism. Current Issues in Tourism. pp. 17-47. – Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13683500.2017.1316971
4. Beresford, N.A. 2019. Field effects studies in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone: Lessons to be learnt / N.A. Beresford, E.M. Scott, D. Copplestone. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity – Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265931X17309347
5. Berger, J. 2006. Nuclear Tourism and the Manhattan Project / Jenna Berger. Columbia Journal of American Studies. University of Houston. 7, pp. 196- 214, 2006, Retrieved from https://www.columbia.edu/cu/cjas/print/nuclear_tourism.pdf?q=manhattanproject-test-site
6. Bliss, L. 2014. Atomic Tests Were a Tourist Draw in 1950s Las Vegas – Retrieved from https://www.citylab.com/equity/2014/08/atomic-tests-were-a-touristdraw-in-1950s-las-vegas/375802/ Boyle, R. 2017. Greetings from Isotopia. / Rebecca Boyle Distillations. 3 (3): 26–35. Retrieved June 14, 2018. Retrieved from https://www.sciencehistory.org/distillations/magazine/greetings-fromisotopia
7. Brand, S., Platter, N. 2011 Dark Tourism: The Commoditisation of Suffering and Death // The Long Tail of Tourism: Holiday Niches and their Impact on Mainstream Tourism / Alexis Papathanassis. pp. 7–15. New York: Springer. – Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-8349-6231-7
8. Bürkner, D. 2014. The Chernobyl Landscape and the Aesthetics of Invisibility / Daniel Bürkner // Photography and Culture. – Т. 7. – №. 1. – Р. 21 - Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2752/175145214X13936100122282
9. Dashchinsky, O. 2019. Chomu biloruska chornobylska zona pryimaie znachno menshe turystiv, nizh ukrainska [Why Belarusian Chornobyl Zone Consumes Fewer Tourists Than Ukrainian] Oles Dashchinsky – Retrieved from https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/chornobyl-turyzmbilorus/29999919.html (in Ukrainian).
10. Department of Energy: DOE – Retrieved from https://www.energy.gov/
11. Frantal, B., Urbankova, R. 2017 Energy tourism: an emerging field of study. Current Issues in Tourism, Vol. 20, No. 13, pp. 1395–1412, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.987734 – Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13683500.2014.987734
12. Gauldie, R. 2019 The rise of dark tourism. Retrieved from https://www.itij.com/latest/long-read/rise-darktourism
13. Gerster, R., 2013. The Bomb in the Museum: Nuclear Technology and the Human Element. Museum & Society, 11(3), 207-218. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a71c/bdc56234fe9df1caa523f54b1d61c676f7ee.pdf
14. Goatcher, J., Brunsden, V. 2011 Chernobyl and the Sublime Tourist. Tourist Studies, 11(2), pp. 115–137, 2011. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271568100_Dark_and_toxic_tourism_in_the_Chernobyl_exclusion_zone
15. Hiroshima Peace Memorial (Genbaku Dome)// UNESCO – Retrieved from https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/775
16. Italie, L. 2011. Japan disaster boosts interest in atomic tourism. AZ Central/Associated Press. Retrieved 15 June2018. – Retrieved from http://archive.azcentral.com/travel/articles/2011/03/30/20110330japan-disaster-atomic-tourism.html
17. Kaluha, V.F. 2018. Features and prospects of event tourism in Ukraine on the example of Transcarpathian region / V.F.Kaluha, S.I. Uliganets, L.V. Melnyk. Science and Education a New Dimension. Humanities and Social Sciences, VI (29), I.: 178, 2018 Sept. – р. 89-92. Retrieved from http://seanewdim.com/uploads/3/4/5/1/34511564/hum_vi_178_29.pdf
18. Lennon, J., Foley, M. 2000 Dark Tourism in the American West. Dark Tourism: The Attraction of Death and Disaster. London: Continuum. – Retrieved from https://gcu.elsevierpure.com/ws/portalfiles/portal/25070176/Lennon_Oxford_Diction_Dark_Tourism_17_10_2016_1_.pdf
19. Lisichenko, G.V. 2016. Pro stan ta perspektyvy naukovykh doslidzhen i rozrobok u zoni vidchuzhennia Chornobylskoi AES [About the state and prospects of scientific researches and developments in the area of exclusion of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant] G.V. Lisychenko, V.V. Petruk. Visnyk of NAS of Ukraine, 2016, N.11. Retrieved
from http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/109874/07-Lysychenko.pdf (in Ukrainian).
20. Mazeikiene, N., Gerulaitienė, E. 2018 Commodification of cultural identities and/or empowerment of local communities: developing a route of nuclear tourism society, integration, education // Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Volume V, May 25th-26th, 2018.145-158 // – Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325368566_COMMODIFICATION_OF_CULTURAL_IDENTITIES_ANDOR_EMPOWERMENT_OF_LOCAL_COMMUNITIES_DEVELOPING_A_ROUTE_OF_NUCLEAR_TOURISM
21. Mazeikiene, N., Gerulaitienė, E. 2018. Educational aspects of nuclear tourism: sites, objects and museums. Proceedings of EDULEARN18 Conference 2nd-4th July, 2018, Palma, Mallorca, Spain. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326714184_EDUCATIONAL_ASPECTS_OF_NUCLEAR_TOURISM_SITES_OBJECTS_AND_MUSEUMS
22. Morris, H. 2014 The Stalkers: Inside the bizarre subculture that lives to explore Chernobyl’s Dead Zone. Retrieved from https://slate.com/news-andpolitics/2014/09/the-stalkers-inside-the-youthsubculture-that-explores-chernobyls-dead-zone.html
23. Official website of «The Chornobyl Tour». Retrieved from
https://www.chernobylwel.com/our-tours?gclid=CjwKCAjwtNf6BRAwEiwAkt6UQm9kOzOKAl8T3N5tE5QAARXAFSrx305Myj4XPVABfsEDXBim_mEMIBoCjmQQAvD_BwE
24. Official website of State Agency of Ukraine on Exclusion Zone Management. Retrieved from http://dazv.gov.ua/en/
25. Osofsky, LuLing, MacFarlane, K. 2019. Nuclear in Miniature: Atomic Tourism in New Mexico.
Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332539323_Nuclear_in_Miniature_Atomic_Tourism_in_New_Mexico
26. Pasqualetti, M. 2012. Reading the changing energy landscape. Sustainable energy landscapes: Designing, planning, and development (Eds. S. Stremke & A. Van Den Dobbelsteen), pp. 11– 44, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2012.
27. Pestushko, V.Yu. 2012. Chornobylska AES yak turystychna destynatsiia [ Cornobyl NPP as a tourist destination] V.Yu. Pestushko, Yu.P. Chubuk. Geography and Tourism. – V. 9. – P. 82-86. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/gt_2010_9_16 (in Ukrainian).
28. Ropeik, D. 2012 The Rise of Nuclear Fear-How We Learned to Fear the Radiation / David Ropeik. SCIENTIFICAMERICAN. Retrieved from
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/the-rise-of-nuclear-fear-how-we-learned-to-fearthe-bomb/
29. Schäfer S. 2016. From Geisha Girls to the Atomic Bomb Dome: Dark Tourism and the Formation of Hiroshima Memory. Tourist Studies, Vol. 16(4), pp, 351–366. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286637403_From_Geisha_girls_to_the_Atomic_Bomb_Dome_Dark_tourism_and_the_formation_of_Hiroshima_memory
30. Shkaruba, A. 2019. Chernobyl science and politics in Belarus: The challenges of post-normal science and political transition as a context for science–policy interfacing / Anton Shkaruba, Hanna Skryhan. Environmental Science & Policy. – Volume 92, 152-160. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901118301047
31. Solonina Y. 2017. Chornobyl: pryroda, zakhyshchena radiatsiieiu [Chernobyl: nature protected by radiation]. Retrieved from https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/28421326.html (in Ukrainian).
32. Stone P. R., Hartmann R., Seaton T., Sharpley R., White L. 2017. The Palgrave Handbook of Dark Tourism Studies, Palgrave Macmillan. 781.
33. Technologies for Peace Tourism. Atomic Heritage Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.atomicheritage.org/history/technologies-peacetourism
34. Smolij, V. Chornobylske dosie KGB. (2019). Suspilni nastroi. ChAES u postavariinyi period: zbirnyk dokumentiv pro katastrofu na Chornobylskii AES [The Chornobyl record of the KGB, 2019. Public Sentiment. Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in the post-war period: a collection of documents on the Chernobyl nuclear disaster] Ed. Kol.: A. Kogut, I. Lyabakh, M. Panova, A. Rublev, V. Khrupko; Order: O. Bazhan, V. Birchak. / Sectoral State Archive of the Security Service of Ukraine; Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine; Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance. K., 1200.
35. Yankovska G., Hannam K. 2014. Dark and toxic tourism in the Chernobyl exclusion zone. Current Issues in Tourism. pp. 929-939. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13683500.2013.820260
Published
2020-12-26
How to Cite
Kaluha, V., Uliganets, S., Dmytruk, O., Melnyk, L., & Kupach, T. (2020). Chornobyl Phenomenon: Catastrophe, Experimental Area vs Curiousity Object. Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology, 29(4), 701-709. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15421/112063