Commercialization of the nature-resource potential of anthropogenic objects (on the example of exhausted mines and quarries)


Keywords: tourism, commercialization, investment, anthropogenic object, mines, reclamation

Abstract

In this article we developed scientific and applied foundations of commercialization of the nature-resource potential of anthropogenic objects, on theexample of exhausted mines. It is determined that the category of “anthropogenic object” can be considered in a narrow-applied sense, as specific anthropogenic objects to ensure the target needs, and in a broad theoretical sense, meaning everything that is created and changed by human influence, that is the objects of both artificial and natural origin. It was determined that problems of commercialization of the natural-resource potential of anthropogenic objects are most often considered by researchers for specific objects, without having complex methodological coverage from the point of view of combining environmental, technical, economic and managerial components. When studying the substantiation of the scientific base, the authors confirmed the feasibility of the commercialization of natural-resource potential of anthropogenic objects on the example of a number of theoretical scientific studies in reclamation, reconstruction, recreation, remediation, restoration of biological productivity and economic value of land disturbed by economic activity. The considered examples of exhausted mines in the 21st century in the USA, Canada, Germany, Romania, and Poland indicate a wide range of opportunities for their commercialization. The study of the potential for commercialization of exhausted mines in the post-Soviet countries testified to the underused reserves for the commercialization of their nature-resource potential and their high potential for further development. The authors proposed the identification of anthropogenic objects on the basic livelihood spheres of society. There were identified the main system (natural, biological, technical, economic, social,managerial) and structural (subjects, trends, threats, risks, problems, challenges) factors of diagnosing the state of an anthropogenic object. A set of measures has been developed for commercialization of an anthropogenic object in functional and production activities, product policy, financial and investment spheres, pricing and sales policies, promotion, management and determination of property rights. Recommendations were provided on optimizing the management decision-making process based on a set of positivistic development principles, methods, and management functions. The study allows international organizations, state and local authorities, territorial communities, owners and potential investors to see new opportunities and make mutually beneficial decisions on the rational use of the nature-resource potential of anthropogenic objects.

Author Biographies

S. E. Sardak
Oles Honchar Dnipro National University
O. P. Krupskyi
Oles Honchar Dnipro National University
S. I. Korotun
National University of Water and Environmental Engineering
D. E. Reshetniak
Oles Honchar Dnipro National University

References

1. Bauer, A.M., Ford, R.E. (2014). Reclamation planning of pits and mines. Landscape Architecture, 104(7), 146–149.
2. Bioremediation and Bioeconomy. (2016). doi:10.1016/c2014-0-02734-7.
3. Dal Sasso, P., Ottolino, M. A., &Caliandro, L. P. (2012). Identification of Mines Rehabilitation Scenarios: A Case Study Within the Metropolitan Area of Bari (Italy). Environmental Management, 49(6), 1174–1191. doi:10.1007/s00267-012-9847-0.
4. Eden Project. (n.d.). Retrieved October 11, 2018. Access mode: https://www.edenproject.com/. – Title from screen.
5. Eßer, G., Janz, S., & Walther, H. (2017). Promoting biodiversity in recultivating the Rhenish lignitemining area. World of Mining –Surface and Underground, 69(6), 327–334.
6. Federal Law of the Russian Federation "On Environmental Protection" № 7-ФЗ from 10.01.2002. – Access mode: http://extwprlegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/rus52751E.pdf. – Title from screen.
7. Fox, H. R., Moore, H. M., & McIntosh, A. D. (1998). Land reclamation: achieving sustainable benefits.
8. Górecki, J., &Sermet, E. (2010). Kamieniołomy Krakowa–dziedzictwoniedocenione [Mines of Krakow – an underestimated heritage]. W: Zagożdżon, P., Madziarz, M.,(eds), Dziejegórnictwa–element europejskie godziedzictwa kultury, 3, 123-138 (in Polish).
9. Gunn, J. M. (Ed.) (2012). Restoration and recovery of an industrial region: progress in restoring the smelter-damaged landscape near Sudbury, Canada. Springer Science & Business Media.
10. Gustafson, A. (2000). Making sense of postmodern business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(3), 654–658. doi:10.2307/3857896.
11. Hüttl, R. F., Heinkele, T., & Wisniewski, J. (Eds.). (1996). MinesiteRecultivation. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8694-8
12. Krinke, R. (2001). Overview: design practice and manufactured sites. Manufactured sites: Rethinking the post-industrial landscape, 125-149.
13. Louisville Mega Cavern. (n.d.). Retrieved October 10, 2018. Access mode: https://louisvillemegacavern.com/. – Title from screen.
14. Luc, M., & Szmańda, J. (2014). Should renaturalised and recultivated landscapes appear in landscape typology? QuaestionesGeographicae, 33(3), 65–75. doi 10.2478/quageo-2014-0030.
15. Luc, M., & Szmańda, J. B. (2015). Renaturalized and Recultivated Landscapes as a Result of Sustainable Landscape Management. Landscape Analysis and Planning, 271–292. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13527-4_16.
16. Lyle, D. (2004). Butchart Gardens. The Public Historian, 26(4), 88–90. doi: 10.1525/tph.2004.26.4.88.
17. Martin, D., & Berlin, H. (2012). Mines Next Quest. Planning, 78(2), 40–42
18. Mudroch, A., Stottmeister, U., Kennedy, C., &Klapper, H. (Eds.) (2002). Remediation of Abandoned Surface Coal Mining Sites: A NATO-Project.
Springer Science & Business Media.
19. Salina Turda (n.d.). Retrieved October 18, 2018. – Access mode: http://salinaturda.eu/. – Title from screen.
20. Sapkota, R. P., Stahl, P. D., &Rijal, K. (2018). Restoration governance: An integrated approach towards sustainably restoring degraded ecosystems. Environmental Development, 27, 83–94. doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2018.07.001.
21. Sardak, S. (2016). The life cycle of social and economic systems. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 157-169. (in Ukrainian).
22. Sardak, S., Korneyev, M., Simakhova, A., &Bilskaya, O. (2017). Global factors which influence the directions of social development. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(3), 323-333. doi:http://10.21511/ppm.15(3-2).2017.02.
23. Shrestha, A., &Mehmood, S. R. (2018). Economic Impacts of the Shortleaf-Bluestem Community Restoration Project. Journal of Forestry, 116(6), 505–512. doi:10.1093/jofore/fvy038.
24. Singleton, V. L., Jacob, B., Feeney, M. T., & Little, J. C. (2013). Modeling a Proposed Quarry Reservoir for Raw Water Storage in Atlanta, Georgia. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 139(1), 70–78. doi:10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000582.
25. Stukalo, N. V., Krasnikova, N. A., Krupskyi, O. P., &Redko, V. Y. (2018). Fostering Sustainable Tourism in Global Economy. Revista ESPACIOS, 39(42). Retrieved October 18, 2018. – Access mode: http://www.revistaespacios.com/a18v39n42/18394227.html.
26. Wieliczka-saltmine.com. (n.d.). Tourist Route: “Wieliczka” Salt Mine. Retrieved October 16, 2018. Access mode: https://www.wieliczkasaltmine.com/visiting/tourist-route. – Title from screen.
27. «Zelena» ekonomika: vid hlobalʹnoyikontseptsiyi do realiymistsevohorozvytku [«Green» economy: from global concept to reality of local development]. (2018). Dnipro, Ukraine: Serednyak. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1294014 (in Ukrainian).
Published
2019-04-21