Mapping the spatial and temporal distribution of changes in the administrative-territorial division


  • O. Havriushyn
Keywords: administrative-territorial division, mapping, timelines, generalization of time-varying data, spatial and temporal distribution of changes

Abstract

The article is devoted to the development of the content of generalized maps on the history of administrative-territorial division. The purpose of such maps is to reflect the features of the space-time distribution of administrative changes.We have found that it is better to link indicators of dynamics to such spatial objects as the territories of modern administrative-territorial units (or the territory of historical administrative-territorial ones as of a certain date), to polygons of a single history of administrative membership, to administrative-territorial units as dynamic objects.Under the polygons of a single history of administrative ownership, we mean the territories identified during the analysis, all points within which belonged to the same administrative-territorial unit at any time during the analyzed period. Unlike polygons of the smallest common geometry (used in the method of space-time composites), such objects can be allocated for different periods of time and for different administrative levels.For such spatial objects, we propose to calculate and display on the map the number ofchanges in administrative ownership or the total duration of belonging to some administrative-territorial unit (usually, a high level). For larger static areas than the polygons of a single history of administrative affiliation, we suggest calculating and displaying on the map the indicator of administrative variability and the average duration of ownership. In our opinion, the indicator of administrative variability should consider the size of the analyzed territory, the number and volume of spatial changes. We have developed a formula for calculating such an indicator.The indicators that we calculate for historical administrative-territorial units on the map are dis- played within the static contour. However, these indicators are calculated for a dynamic object. These indicators are: the number of changes, the total number of changes in parameters, the total number of dates of change, the spatial configuration variability index, the area-weighted average area and its relation to the modern one. We propose to calculate the index of the variability of the configuration of the administrative-territorial unit as the sum of the relations of the areas of the reassigned territories to the areas of the administrative-territorial unit at the time before the change. Since different administrative-territorial units have different duration of existence, in our opinion, it is important to analyze not only the quantity but also the intensity of the changes. To reflect on the map the course of changes in the administrative-territorial unit in time, we developed a timeline-based chart.

Author Biography

O. Havriushyn
Oles Honchar Dnipro National University

References

1. Berman, Merrick Lex. 2005. Boundaries or networks in historical GIS: Concepts of measuring space and administrative geography in Chinese history. Historical Geography. 118-133.
2. Berman, Merrick Lex. 2009. Modeling and Visualizing Historical GIS Data. Retrieved from http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~chgis/work/docs/ papers/CGA_Wkshp2009_Lex_9apr09.pdf
3. DeMoor, M., & Wiedemann, T. 2001. Reconstructing territorial units and hierarchies: an example from Belgium. History and Computing, 13, 71-97.
4. Gregory, I.N. 2002. A Place in History: A Guide to Using GIS in Historical Research. Oxford
5. Gregory, I. 2002. Time-variant GIS databases of changing historical administrative boundaries: a European comparison. Transactions in GIS, 6(2), 161-178. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9671.00103
6. Gregory, I. 2002. The accuracy of areal interpolation techniques: standardising 19th and 20th century census data to allow long-term comparisons. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26(4), 293-314. DOI: 10.1016/S0198- 9715(01)00013-8
7. Havriushyn, O. 2018. Uzahalnennia riznochasovykh danykh z istorii administratyvno-terytorialnoho podilu zasobamy HIS [Generalization of different-time data on the history of administrative-territorial division in GIS]. Inzhenerna heodeziia – Engineering geodesy, 65, 150–158 [in Ukrainian] Retrievedfrom http://geojournal.xyz/docu-ments/65_journal.pdf
8. Nüssli, M.-A. and Nüssli C. (n.d.) From Historical Mapping to Historical Geographical Information System / Nüssli Marc-Antoine, Nüssli Christos. Retrieved from
www.euratlas.net/tele/euratlas_HGIS.pdf
9. Ott, T. and Swiaczny, F. 2001. Time-Integrative Geographic Information Systems: Management and Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Data. Berlin / Heidelberg / New York: Springer
10. Renolen, A. 1999. Concepts and methods for modelling temporal and spatiotemporal information. Partial fulfilment for the degree “Thesis”, NTNU. Retrieved from http://www.emap.no/docs/The- sisAgnarRenolen.pdf
11. Trotsenko, O.V. 2008. Doslidzhennia zmin admi- nistratyvno-terytorialnoho ustroiu rehionu yak bazovoi skladovoi systemy vtrachenykh heohrafichnykh obiektiv (na prykladi Dnipropetrovskoi oblasti) [Investigation of changes in the administrative-territorial structure of the region as the basic component of the system of lost geographic objects (for example, Dnipropetrovsk region)] Naukovi zapysky Vinnytskoho pedahohichnoho universytetu – Scientific notes of Vinnytsya State Pedagogical University named after Michailo Kotzubynsky. Series: Geography. issue. 17, 25-30 [in Ukrainian].
12. Vanhaute, E. 2005. The Belgium Historical GIS. Historical Geography, 33, 136–139.
13. World History Maps & Timelines | GeaCron Retrieved from http://geacron.com/
Published
2018-11-02
How to Cite
Havriushyn, O. (2018). Mapping the spatial and temporal distribution of changes in the administrative-territorial division. Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology, 27(2), 213-221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15421/111846